|
All Archives /
aussie-isp /
2004-12
|
<<< Date >>> | |
| Permanent Link | ||
|
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 11:59:32 +1100
From: Craig Sanders To: Oz-ISP Mailing list Message-Id: <20041201005932.GC22136@taz.net.au> In-Reply-To: <1101861454.3811.22.camel@dragonslair.au00.com> References: <20041126123954.GF4563@taz.net.au> <1101515903.3926.19.camel@dragonslair.au00.com> <20041127013438.GH4563@taz.net.au> <1101548020.3920.24.camel@dragonslair.au00.com> <20041128001909.GC2757@taz.net.au> <1101762796.3933.9.camel@dragonslair.au00.com> <20041129215727.GC26817@taz.net.au> <1101781689.3933.56.camel@dragonslair.au00.com> <20041130042257.GB10516@taz.net.au> <1101861454.3811.22.camel@dragonslair.au00.com> Subject: Re: [Oz-ISP] DNS hijacking and Pennsylvania Web blocking law (struck down) |
Followups: <20041202042056.GK22136@taz.net.au> |
|
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 10:37:34AM +1000, Reid wrote: > > it is illegal for a carrier to intercept telecommunications traffic. > > it is illegal for an ISP to intercept telecomms. > > it is illegal for a private citizen to intercept telecomms. > > it is illegal for a business, company, corporation, association, or other > > organisation to intercept telecomms. > > it is illegal for a government department to intercept telecomms. > > it is illegal for *ANYONE AT ALL* to intercept telecomms. > > Spelling out complete. Thank you Craig. i'm glad you finally understand the bleeding obvious. it's only taken about half a dozen attempts. i'll assume that that's pretty good going for you, so i guess congratulations are in order. > > the only exception is when there is a duly authorised warrant that > > specifically permits such diversion or interception. > > It's a huge leap of faith to take phone tapping law, and apply it to > dns provision, but what the hell go ahead. Take it to court and try > it. You i never mentioned phone tapping. i mentioned telecommunications interception and diversion. but i suppose this kind of crap is to be expected - you've demonstrated several times before that you're not above introducing irrelevancies in order to divert the debate. in fact, it appears to be your favourite, if not only, tactic. try sticking to the point. craig -- craig sanders <c a s @ t a z . n e t . a u (part time cyborg) ---- email "unsubscribe aussie-isp" to m a j o r d o m o @ a u s s i e . n e t to be removed. |
|