|
All Archives /
aussie-isp /
2006-01
|
<<< Date >>> | |
| Permanent Link | ||
|
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:51:22 +1030
From: David Newall To: Brendan Pratt Cc: aussie-isp Message-Id: <43C70092.2000308@rebel.net.au> In-Reply-To: <43C647BA.4040908@overflow.net.au> References: <200511180532.jAI5Wkm16917@carpediem.eintellego.net> <437DA1BB.4050509@rebel.net.au> <000901c5ec40$07253c30$0264a8c0@spider> <437DFC29.1030307@rebel.net.au> <002801c5ec6f$df1e3130$0264a8c0@spider> <200601111625230851.72729DE4@smtp1.ace.net.au> <43C5C97B.2060505@broome.wa.gov.au> <43C647BA.4040908@overflow.net.au> Subject: Re: [Oz-ISP] Replacement list? |
Followups: |
|
Brendan Pratt wrote: > Kai Jones said the following on 12/01/2006 1:14 PM: >> I think we agreed to use a u s s i e - i s p @ t a z . n e t . a u because it processes >> our mail much faster ? > > That's the general impression I was getting. :) Your impression is wrong. There is a new list, and I'm told that some people even use it, but there's no general agreement to that effect. > I figure that the lack of traffic in this list was because it had > fallen over _again_ , and didn't worry too much about it. If traffic on the taz list isn't being sent to this one then the taz list is failing in it's charter. I understood it was to be forwarded to this one (and this to the other.) Anyway, the bottom line is there's no general agreement to replace this list. ---- email "unsubscribe aussie-isp" to m a j o r d o m o @ a u s s i e . n e t to be removed. |
|