|
All Archives /
aussie-isp /
2006-01
|
<<< Date >>> | |
| Permanent Link | ||
|
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:32:16 +1000
From: Bevan Slattery To: Craig Sanders, aussie-isp Message-Id: <F99B9985B4841745A5A49DF078D98B9FDE92E2@WIC001EBCLV1.exchange.server-login.com> Subject: RE: [Oz-ISP] Replacement list? |
Followups: <43CA3E18.4010002@australiaonline.net.au> |
|
...and to be honest we're (AUGNOG) not interested in having a list made of every tom, dick, harry, harriette, newbie, whirlpool user, pc shop employee etc. *unless* they are also involved in operating networks (and not a 192.x.x.x behind a linksys 'core router'). That's what Oz-ISP is for... Cheers [b] > -----Original Message----- > From: m a j o r d o m o - o w n e r @ k o a l a . a u s s i e . n e t > [m a i l t o : m a j o r d o m o - o w n e r @ k o a l a . a u s s i e . n e t On Behalf Of Craig Sanders > Sent: Friday, 13 January 2006 12:27 PM > To: a u s s i e - i s p @ a u s s i e . n e t > Cc: a u s s i e - i s p @ t a z . n e t . a u > Subject: Re: [Oz-ISP] Replacement list? > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 11:51:22AM +1030, David Newall wrote: > > Brendan Pratt wrote: > > >Kai Jones said the following on 12/01/2006 1:14 PM: > > > > I think we agreed to use a u s s i e - i s p @ t a z . n e t . a u because it > > > > processes our mail much faster ? > > > > > >That's the general impression I was getting. :) > > > > Your impression is wrong. There is a new list, and I'm told > that some > > people even use it, but there's no general agreement to that effect. > > quite a few people use it. membership is up to 163 currently. > > but yeah, there has been no consensus. i doubt there ever will be. > > > > > I figure that the lack of traffic in this list was because it had > > > fallen over _again_ , and didn't worry too much about it. > > > > If traffic on the taz list isn't being sent to this one > then the taz > > list is failing in it's charter. I understood it was to be > forwarded > > to this one (and this to the other.) > > no, absolutely not. i've said this several times now, but the > new list will not be set up to forward posts to the old list. > that would be the same as subscribing people to the new list > without their explicit consent, which would be spamming. > > if people on the old list want to subscribe, they know what > to do. it's easy, and takes only a few minutes. if they don't > want to go to that bother, then it's not my place (or anyone > else's) to decide that i know what's best for them and > subcribe them (via the old aussie-isp list) anyway. > > > and subbing both lists to each other would just create a > monster dupe-loop. double-plus ungood. > > > craig > > -- > craig sanders <c a s @ t a z . n e t . a u (part time cyborg) > ---- > email "unsubscribe aussie-isp" to m a j o r d o m o @ a u s s i e . n e t to be removed. > ---- email "unsubscribe aussie-isp" to m a j o r d o m o @ a u s s i e . n e t to be removed. |
|