|
All Archives /
aussie-isp /
2006-04
|
<<< Date >>> | |
| Permanent Link | ||
|
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 15:46:27 +1000
From: Michael Tibben To: aussie-isp, aussie-isp Message-Id: <4445CEB3.7070908@webdock.com.au> In-Reply-To: <000301c66362$96bc5e70$2522630a@t22> References: <000301c66362$96bc5e70$2522630a@t22> Subject: Re: [Oz-ISP] SPF Records |
Followups: |
|
Sean Winn wrote: > The lack of value comes from the layer of trust being effectively > worthless, both as it applies to spam (validating a domain doesn't buy > you much until domains get some trust), and for forgery in general based > on the current implementations (very few large sites publish restrictive > SPF records.) > > The former won't change readily, the latter may. I'm not holding my > breath for either. I'm as guilty as anyone else of using '?all' where I > can't be sure everyone's sending through my server. > This is true.... and I can't believe that those who need this technology more than anyone... ie banks.... are STILL not publishing SPF records national.com.au - no SPF commbank.com.au - no SPF anz.com.au - no SPF If ISPs are making the effort to implement SPF for incoming email, large companies and especially banks should be making a decent effort as well.... implementing SPF is one of the first things they should be doing to stop email phishing Michael ---- email "unsubscribe aussie-isp" to m a j o r d o m o @ a u s s i e . n e t to be removed. |
|